Transforming Indonesia into Asia’s Economic Powerhouse in 20 Years


I am nothing compared to brilliant economists out there, but I would like to share my perspectives as a young person who studies business, and of course, the economy. This is the paper I wrote for one of my finals in February 2010 (things have changed, yeah). Happy reading, friends! (More after the jump)

Chairul Tanjung, Anthony Salim, James Riady, along with other executives and senior government officials of Indonesia, clustered themselves into an organisation that has been planning for a project called “Visi Indonesia 2030” or “Indonesia’s 2030 Vision” (Davies, 2008). It endeavours to reach a goal of making Indonesia one of the globe’s five leading economies in two decades, as well as having 30 business firms in the Global Fortune 500 (Davies, 2008). The plan seems attainable by linking it to some pleasant facts about Indonesia. For example, a number of US analysts stated that the BRIC economies, which consist of Brazil, Russia, India, and China, must now include Indonesia (Ichsan, 2009). At the same time, a securities house has labeled Indonesia as one of the three Asia’s economic barricades, alongside with China and India (Ichsan, 2009). Indonesia is also included in the Next Eleven (N-11), 11 countries grouped by the Goldman Sachs according to its high potential in becoming the world’s most significant economies in this century (O’Neill et al., 2005).

Nevertheless, we still cannot ignore the fact that Indonesia was the country that suffered the most when Asia had to go through the regional financial crisis over a decade ago. In that period, the value of Rupiah was lessened by 35 percent in 24 hours. The exchange rate of US Dollars elated from around IDR 3,000 to 16,800 in 1998. According the World Bank’s data, the economy shriveled by 13% due to the fall of Suharto’s regime. Both the regional crisis and the political instability became the reasons why investors deserted the country. Hence, there are still plenty of things that ought to be done to realise the plan, other than the ambiguous “hard work and collaboration by all of Indonesia’s people”, which became Tanjung’s answer when he was asked on how to realise the ambitious “Visi Indonesia 2030”.

It is not exaggerated at all to say that Indonesia already has all of the potentials to emerge into a regional economic powerhouse, but at the same time, it still has millions of people living below the $1.50 poverty line everyday. Where did all the money go? What has all of the profit of selling extracted natural resources turned into? One of the most unfortunate facts of Indonesia is that it is notorious for the corruption, which exists in almost any foundation. Corruption has soaked into both Indonesia’s culture and system, which makes it more or less related to the weak bureaucracy system. So, in order to realise its goal on becoming Asia’s economic powerhouse in 2030, Indonesia should optimise its potentials by eradicating corruption and conducting bureaucracy reform.

As we all have known, Indonesia is rich in both natural and human resources. It also has more than 230 million people as citizens of the country, making it as one of the five most-populated countries in the world. In 2009, Indonesia’s stock exchange (IDX) index once ascended by 95 percent (Ichsan, 2009). The figure has turned it into the bourse that has performed best in Asia, yet also becomes the second-best in the world. By having these marvelous facts, Indonesia must have attracted foreign investors to start investing in the archipelago again, promising more and more profit with a relatively lower minimum wage for local labours than the ones other countries have.

In addition, it has a lot of factors that is going to promise bigger things for investors. Indonesia has gradually gained political stability, which is also one of the most important things to be considered by foreign investors, after it became a fully democratic country through having the general elections in 1999. The result of the last presidential elections, resulting in the re-election of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who is now teaming up with Boediono, has also played an important role in bringing former investors back to Indonesia and keeping the ones who are already here to stay.

In his past five-year term, President Yudhoyono has ingeniously created positive changes to support investors, including his anti-corruption programs as well as tax reforms. It can be interfered that investors believe these changes would continue to the next level, as he was being re-elected. Moreover, the fact that a former governor of Bank Indonesia became the vice president of Indonesia, also implicitly promises something good to business executives, because he is going to be coordinating the next economic lineup.

If we see a little further to the past five-year term of presidency, Indonesia has reached an undeniably good position in the global economy. Based on the third-quarter’s “2008 Monetary Policy Report of Indonesia”, while other countries are suffering due to the global financial crisis, Indonesia’s economy recorded a positive growth because domestic consumption is one of Indonesia’s main economic pillars, dominating the whole income by 60 percent. In 2008, Indonesia had a safe and sound balance sheet consists of $52 billion of assets, as well as having its government debt as much as only one-third of its GDP, making it the lowest compared to other countries in Southeast Asia (Wirjawan, 2008). It continued to the first semester in 2009, where Indonesia’s GDP growth was the third highest amongst the G-20 countries at the rate of 4.2 percent (Ichsan, 2009).

Sadly, only by living a normal life in Indonesia, we can all agree that Indonesia’s growth is not evenly balanced. While there are hundred thousands of people like Chairul Tanjung, Anthony Salim, and James Riady living in big cities, there are millions of people who still live below the poverty line in villages and remote areas, or even in the capital itself. This reality can probably the biggest barrier to achieve the “Indonesia’s 2030 Vision” plan.

Particularly, the endemic corruption and ineffectual system are two of the biggest problems that are going to be faced in realising the plan, which includes rising per capita income to $18,000. According to the World Bank’s data, Indonesia’s per capita income in 2008 was $2,254, which is still inevitably very far from the target. Analysts think that real growth will have to be 8.5 percent in average to actualise the plan. On the other hand, Fauzi Ichsan, an economist who now serves at the Standard Chartered Bank as its Senior Vice President, believes that Indonesia can probably be in the G-7 in 2045, 15 years later than the deadline of the plan, by only growing with the average annual rate seen in the past 10 years. We can positively say that the goal should be able to be reached in two decades if we can eradicate corruption and conduct bureaucracy reform.

In Indonesia, corruption used to be seen as a habit and part of a tradition, instead of a crime. In 32 years, ruled by the military regime of Suharto, corruption has become something that is very common to be done. In this country, gaining promotions, getting good grades, to releasing yourself from being captured by the police can all be done only by giving money. President Yudhoyono realised that corruption is the root of every economic and social welfare problem in Indonesia. For this reason, he has put anti-corruption drive on his top priorities since the beginning of his presidency.

A decade ago, the Law 31 on Anti-Corruption Acts was legalised, covering not only those who bribe public officials, but also people who benefit themselves or others resulting in loss of the economy of the state, with death penalty as its top punishment (Juwana, 2008). In 2003, the government established the Anti-Corruption Commission (KPK) that has showed great achievements in capturing a large number of white-collar crime villains. Eradicating corruption does not only mean to prove this country’s integrity nor to put the laws back on its foundation, but it also means to catalyse positive change to investment, business, and the economy in general. Stamping corruption out will benefit businesses by pressing down the high-cost economy in Indonesia.

For decades, it has been a common knowledge that in the country, we have to concede an amount of money to maintain relationships with other professionals or government officials. It also has to be done when we would like to obtain documents like business permits, construction permits, or even driving licenses. These facts are contrary to the theory that to create a conducive investment environment, a strong and credible legal system is very much needed. As indicated by the 2008 Corruption Perceptions Index released by Transparency International, Indonesia ranked on number 126. It is on a par with Eritrea, Ethiopia, Guyana, Honduras, Libya, Mozambique, and Uganda, making it as the 54th most corrupt country in the world. If by being as corrupt as that can make Indonesia one of the 20 world’s biggest economies, imagine what can be achieved if its people can eradicate corruption until its core. For these reasons, the government should empower KPK more, as it is now being juggled upside down by other institutions, including the media.

Eradicating corruption is closely related with reforming the bureaucracy system. As it has been stated above, a credible legal system is needed to build the economy through investments by both local and foreign investors. Based on an interview conducted by Reuters in 2007, former Vice President Jusuf Kalla said that the government aimed to provide “good regulation for investors” (Davies, 2008). It leaves a big question mark: what has been done by the government in order to realise the statement?

A good example has been set by the city of Sragen, where its mayor, Untung Wiyono, established an innovation called One Stop Service Center to reform bureaucracy. In Sragen, getting an ID only takes two minutes of our time, whilst it takes at least three days other cities. It only takes 15 days to get a construction permit and 7 days to get a working permit. The success of One Stop Service Center has raised investment by Rp634 million Rupiahs from 2002 to 2004, resulting in the creation of new 3,781 jobs for the society (Herdjoko, 2008). Other cities, or even the central government itself, should replicate the passion of Sragen in creating a new system of bureaucracy.

The knotty bureaucracy in Indonesia seems to be slowing down the economy in becoming the regional economic powerhouse. It takes months to get a working permit, an investment permit, and even businesspeople still need to get thousands of other permits. Despite all the promises that have been given by Indonesia to the world, its bureaucracy is still a nightmare for investors. Establishing One Stop Service Centers can be a solution. Although it is going to take weeks or months to get those required permits, at least investors only have to come to one place to take care of everything they need. It can as well gradually eliminate corruption, since having a One Stop Service needs less workers. It can be started by giving disciplinary sanctions to workers who work inefficiently, or even diminish them from the list of employees if the amount of employees exceeds the workload.

Fortunately, it has been done in a few government institutions. Just like Wiyono, the Minister of Finance Sri Mulyani knows that bureaucracy reform is one of the most important things that have to be done in order to put Indonesia’s economy on a better position. Investigation within the Ministry of Finance conducted by the end of last year brought sanctions to more than 1,950 employees and dishonourably discharged more than 150 employees (Pasandaran, 2009).

As have been stated by both local and foreign economists, Indonesia is an emerging economic powerhouse that has whatever it takes to become bigger as time goes by. This country has already been included as one of the world’s 20 leading economies, and it is very likely to rank higher in the upcoming years with all of its potentials. However, the “Indonesia’s 2030 Vision” and its other ambitious goals would never be achieved if the powerless legal system is not being exterminated. In order to develop into Asia’s economic powerhouse in two decades, Indonesia needs to eliminate corruption and restructure the bureaucracy scheme. If Indonesia can be included in the G-20, BRIICS, and N-11 in only one decade after being labeled as “the sick man of Asia”, we can all be pretty optimistic about its future if it struggles for more and more development and growth.


Attached is the data and analysis I presented in the Global Changemakers at the London Summit 2009 in April 2009, where youth representatives from G-20 countries met and discussed possible recommendations for the G-2o communique. We produced our own communique and handed it to David Milliband, who back then was the Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs, before the real communique was produced.

43 thoughts on “Transforming Indonesia into Asia’s Economic Powerhouse in 20 Years

  1. rad

    Look, the beloved IDX was mentioned several times!! Long live Indonesian investors.

    Although I personally have faith on primary and secondary markets and the tertiary sector, I strongly support further development of the Republic’s real sector i.e. the primary and the secondary. The subsistence needs of man are food, after all.

  2. this posting is awesome, more young people aware that our country is the right track to be economy’s powerhouse is the good news, Indonesia needs support from young generation, and the raising of middle class people in Indonesia is totally magnificent, it grows more and more, from 25 millions in 1999 to 150 millions today (2012)

    politically, our country is well known as ASEAN’s natural leader due to biggest population and largest territory, we could speak and act more than before. and the economically our country is the upcoming member of BRICS, G20 exclusive group membership is not enough.

    can’t wait for more good news from Indonesia!

  3. I think this is among the most significant info for me.
    And i am glad reading your article. But should remark on some general things, The website style is ideal, the articles is really excellent :
    D. Good job, cheers

  4. ニースポスト。いくつかのことは、追加の別のブログに毎日に挑戦私は理解を理解します。 一般に行く|他の作家からコンテンツ素材コンテンツをとそれらの店から幾分何かを練習読むことを刺激します。あなたが気にしないかどうかを| ウェブログ私の| コンテンツ素材コンテンツ私はいくつかを使用することを好むだろう。あなたのインターネットのブログのリンクをごNatually私は ます。共有していただきありがとうございます。

  5. ご挨拶私たちはあなたに感謝です! この本当にこれは 対象ちょっとオフが、私はそのブログ思っていたあなたは、プラットフォームをしている採用 |ウェブサイト|このインターネットサイト?私はハッカーの問題を持っていたと私は てるのでワードプレスの病人や疲れ別のオプションでプラットフォーム。優れた|素晴らしい| プラットフォーム非常に良いです。私は私の上で使用します。 思慮深い洞察力とを

  6. サイトただし持っている必要がありますあなたの投稿のいくつかのスペルをチェックします。確か|それらのいくつかのスペルでいっぱいです難しおよびI 見つける それは非常に厄介な間違いなく、それにもかかわらず、私はよ真実を伝えるために再び|もう一度|確実} {再び戻ってきます。

  7. 、それは私は少し考えさせられました。私の思考キャップをスパークしていただきありがとうございます。時々私はちょうどレコードのように感じるマンネリであまりを取得します。 Appleはコンピュータを発明しなかったとスターバックスは、コーヒー飲料を発明しませんでした場合はこれは私の抜粋

  8. !考慮すべきことなどの詳細の多くは確かにありま​​す。それが起動するのに最適なポイントです。私は一般的なインスピレーション上記の考えを提供しますが、明らかに最も重要なことは、正直、誠実に働くことになり場所を持ち出すのような質問があります。私は、ベストプラクティスは、そのようなことの周りに出現した場合、tは知っていますか?ドンが、私はあなたの仕事は明らかに公正なゲームとして識別されていることを確信しています。男の子と女の子の両方が自分たちの生活の残りのために、ただ一瞬の快楽の影響を感じています。

  9. こんにちは、私はあなたの素晴らしいサイトを崇拝ありません。それは驚異的なブログ記事です。私は本当にyoullのは、将来的に投稿されさらに興味深いトピックを読んで楽しみにしています。アイブ氏は、このことで多くのことを発見しました。お大事に。 -Gregoria Beshaw

  10. !私の識別私は20歳の瞳ですジョンです。私が通過するのが大好き。私は時間の良い取引を持っていけません。これは私が速読の練習を実現し、なぜ、私は場合には、あなたが速読の才能を発見する必要が書籍やmegazines多大通過すると信じています。ただ、はるかに良いと速く通過するためです。とにかく、私はyoullのは、このウェブサイトを維持するために進みたいと考えています。これは本当に素晴らしい場所であると私は再び近い将来以内に再び病気であることを確信してい。

  11. きっとあなたウェブのようなインターネットサイトただし必要あなたの投稿のいくつかのスペルをチェックします。それらのいくつかはスペルでいっぱいですトラブルおよびI 探しそれは本当にそれにもかかわらず、真実を面倒伝えるために、私は間違いなく再び|もう一度|確実} {再び戻ってきます。ここで、正しい右私も、私は停止する方法を知りません

  12. と同時に明るさと暗さ、善と悪との間の微妙な境界線上に踏みながら、物語は徐々に緊張を構築unfoldsが道を購入、それはの観点から行われたかだけで素晴らしいです彼女はNostramoから脱出した後の運命は、57年間の空間に浮遊彼女の事情与えられた彼女に残酷だったので、感傷リプリーは、彼女の娘の誕生日を逃しました。あなたはそれを発見した偉大なテーマを、

  13. 私は彼が を見られるように友人からの電話を受けることを光栄に思っていました。 探している |出版物あなたのウェブログでの経験、実優れた素晴らしい素晴らしい ある。私のような読者の思考していただきありがとうございます、と私はあなたのために望むトップのための成果の専門面エリア 。全体ビアを介して私の配偶者を

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *